CNW knows they are an opinion for hire outfit, but will defend to their dying breath they are not. I expect arguments and challenges with them would go no where. If challenged to defend data, I see why they don't reply because they can't. If challenged another way, they'll send what we see here. Although I won't defend them in any way, I don't know if calling their work "garbage" and "poorly manipulated poorly collected data" gave much of a chance to get any kind of reply other than the insulting one they sent (as true as those accusations may be). At any rate, very unprofessional on their part, and only serves to reinforce what kind of outfit they really are.

*** Retired after 65,000 outstanding miles ***