It has to do with being ready to deal with skeptics. Most folks lack enough information to make an informed comment. But folks like CNW Marketing, Penn and Teller, and a host of hybrid skeptics are out there doing whatever they can to bring hybrids into disrepute. For me, it is a question of being ready with the facts and data to answer any skeptic claim echoed by folks I run into in real life.

I have two Google news 'alerts' for: (1) "hybrid electric" and (2) "CNW Marketing". What these do is give early warning of the "buzz" that is likely to be picked up by skeptics. Depending upon who is echoing these claims, I decide what the follow-up should be:

• newspaper or media - a letter to the editor that points out the inconsistency, distortions or lies. In particular, I address my note to the editor first and always cite the inaccuracy.
• blogs - hostile blogs are ignored. Friendly blogs get the facts and data to answer a skeptic.
• cartoon characters and entertainers - heckling doesn't work but if they are on a travel circuit, it is good to share actual mileage.

Over time, my small voice and the voices of others begin to tell on responsible news editors. Their integrity is all that separates them from entertainment or fluff. As they begin to see skeptics have become sources of lies, misrepresentations and distortions, they become less and less inclined to cite that source. It takes time and won't happen over night but it is necessary.

In my neck of the woods, North Alabama, we have a lot of hybrid skeptics. Anymore they seldom bring their fantasies to me after having to retreat in the face of a calm presentation of the facts and data. Now I don't chase them down but I don't back down.

Bob Wilson (former Marine)

Operation Iraqi Oil Freedom:

Automatic, stock, project car.

My other 1500 cc car:

Automatic, stock, backup car.
Free speech, dialog and knowledge thrives without the poison of SPAM.