View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2007, 12:41 PM
empowah empowah is offline
Active Enthusiast
 
Location: CA
Posts: 67
Default Re: 2009 Ford Fusion Hybrid Photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1stpik View Post
Considering that the Chevy Malibu Hybrid gets only 2 mpg more than the standard Malibu, don't hold your breath for the Fusion [Hybrid].
That's like saying, "Considering that the '06 Accord V-6 Hybrid gets only 4 more mpg than the standard Accord V-6, don't hold your breath for the '07 Camry Hybrid." What does GM's light-hybrid BAS system have to do with Ford's full-hybrid system, especially when they're from different companies? That doesn't make any sense.

Quote:
And be wary of the ol' Saturn-style mpg comparison -- where they build a 4-cyl. hybrid and compare the mpg to the standard V6.
OK, thanks, but no mpg comparisons have even been made for this Fusion. And FWIW, Saturn compared the VUE Green Line mpg against the VUE 4-cylinder for both 2007 and 2008 models.

Quote:
I give Ford a bit more credit than GM, since the Escape Hybrid has been in production for years now, and offers a real improvement in mpg. But, like GM, Ford is WAY late to the game on fuel efficiency.
Honda currently has the Civic Hybrid... and what else? Similarly, Ford has the Escape Hybrid (which, btw, has a greater FE % increase, saves more gas, and offers improved acceleration vs. the non-hybrid, as opposed to worse).

As far as non-hybrids...

Focus - 24/35
Civic - 26/34

Taurus - 18/28
Accord - 19/29

Escape - 20/26
CR-V - 20/27
Element - 20/25

Taurus X - 16/24
Pilot - 16/22

F-150 V8 - 14/19
Ridgeline - 15/20

Quote:
Toyota and Honda were hybrid BEFORE it was cool.
So was Ford. Hell, they had a full-hybrid system that could propel itself on electricity before Honda.

.



Reply With Quote