also, although the final edition of Loose Change did cover the 911 Commission, and asked some serious questions of Gov Keane and a few others the prequel "loose change 2nd edition" really shows some controversial footage of what appears to be additional equipment on the underbelly of flight 175, the 2nd plane to strike the towers.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...29448192753501

The 2nd edition which was released in 2004 has some excellent data that isnt reiterated in the "Final Cut" and is worth watching. Some of the views have changed since including the theory that whatever hit the Pentagon wasnt a passenger plane as the wreckage and crash site was totally devoid of tail sections, wings, etc and the size of the hole didnt correspond with the dimensions of the alleged plane, also parts that were recovered were void of serial numbers, and initially thought to be mismatched or from other planes altogether. This theory is losing popularity as it is now theorized that the Government does indeed have footage ascertaining that it was the alleged plane and is intentionally witholding this evidence so that when it releases it sometime in the near future it hopes to discredit the entire truth movement. This is known as creating a "honey pot" and is a commonly used tactic within the intelligence community. There are also a great deal of disinformation artists out there who are retired high ranking military officials etc spewing out wild theories of holograms from satellites actually hitting the towers and other nonsense with the intent to discredit other officials.

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/p...ion/index.html

And finally a really comprehensive site that correlates everything involving the new world order.

http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

Regardless of where you stand on this issue, it is impossible not to acknowledge that there are MANY unanswered questions concerning the events that day, the debris and absence of plane at Shanksville is totally consistent with a shoot down, the fact that Silverstein, the owner of WTC7 purchased an insurance policy on the building 6 weeks before the 911 specifically covering "acts of terrorism", and the manner in which WTC7 collapsed from minor damage, (lets not forget that GW's brother was the security coordinator for that particular building), the war games "Vigilant Warrior" and others being conducted by NATO on 911 with certain scenarios actually representing hijacked airliners being flown into goverment buildings, the fact that Saddam Hussein and Iraq did not have WMD's, and that we continued to stay there, that were still there, and that the cost of this war (all $600 billion of it which hasnt been factored into the budget yet mind you) doesnt reflect a sincere interest in democratizing those people, its blatantly obvious were our motivation lay, in the 11% of the remaining oil so we can sustain our economy for a little bit longer until were completely out of oil in 2030.

The aformentioned unanswered questions are but of MANY, it is inconceivable that people continue to go with the official story, and continue to rely on corporate media for honest journalism.

Remain vigilant.