Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
Professional scholarship rarely (if ever) quotes other scholarship in full. If academics can produce new scholarship that criticizes old scholarship without the prospect of infringing on copyrights, shouldn't you be able to do the same?
|
Ordinarily I would agree but the problem is the hybrid-skeptics cherry picked their quotes to bring out the worst of the original paper. I don't want to do the same and possibly be misleading. I am particularly interested in what led to their conclusions about profitability that appears to trace to one 2002 paper.
I've loaded the paper into excel and am converting it into separate sentences identified by page and sentence number. I am also beginning to see the two styles although I can not tag them to specific authors, yet.
Bob Wilson