This is often the misguided critic against doing something about climate-change, I mean "man-induced" climate change. I would also add that any figures anyone pulls out to site the cost to fight global warming assumes that not fighting it would result in gradual change that man & civilization can cope with cheaper. Like all things in nature, when a system is in imbalance, it will readjust to a new equilibrium, often very quickly, and that often translate to catastrophically when it is global in scale.

Im afraid my kids will pay 10 times more than 1.4 million to fight the consequences of not doing something while we still can.