Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yahoo! Autos
Hybrid rankings have often been simplistic: Most are little more than lists of the highest-mileage models on the market. Here, we ranked hybrids based on how much fuel savings they get when compared to their non-hybrid version, as well as how much all that saved gas is going to cost you. Examinations that compare hybrids to "comparably equipped" versions miss an important point. Hybrids are almost always among the most expensive trim levels, if not the most costly, but our premise is that you're looking for efficiency first, followed closely by price. This isn't about acceleration, so the hybrids are compared to the lowest-priced, most-efficient gas-only trim level in their model line. Our rankings take into account the hybrid's mileage and price premium, in percent, as well as its suggested retail price. This gives less-expensive models a boost while penalizing more-expensive ones.
|
http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/auto...VuLWh5YnJpZHM-
I find this ranked list interesting, if a bit unexpected in places. I was surprised, as they anticipate, at the relatively low ranking of the FEH, and a bit dismayed to see the HCH only get third. I know, however, that the estimated mileage comparison is a bit off, and of course it's possible to take issue with the comparison to the lowest possible trim level. Few, if any, other cars have as many trim levels and versions as the Honda Civic, at least as far as I know, so it's a bit more of a reach in this case than it might be in some others. I assume you could argue similarly for certain other models, however.
Please discuss!