Quote:
Originally Posted by jill.g@verizon.net
Spinner;
The presumption of innocence resonates just fine with me, I was joking.
Although in the case of Fred; it wouldn't matter who is at fault; Fred would be messed up,
his car would be totalled, and the semi driver would be in the clear. I would rather be wrong, than dead right, as my father used to say. THanks for calling me on that.
Jill
|
No, no.
Listen guys. I may be a little bit crazy, but not totally crazy.
Point #1) As I mentioned, I waited until I got into slow traffic, around 25mph.
Point #2) In PA, presumption of guilt in a rear end collision is always with the party who failed to maintain safe following distance.
Point #3) "Yes indeed officer, I was sure I saw someone's house cat run out in front of my car. Hitting my brakes was just automatic."
Point #4) It would be the semi truck driver who would lose his job after explaining to his boss how he got into a rear end collision. I'd simply go buy another car.