Quote:
Originally Posted by stevedebi
Beats me, you should ask Toyota! RWD is better for performance, but worse for MPG,
"worse for MPG,...."
???? WHY, What %...??
and FWD actually has a lot of traction because the propulsion wheels are under the engine.
"Lot of traction"
????
Due to front weight bias...?? By what %....?
What FWD lacks is the weight distribution between front and rear.
"What FWD lacks..."
But with "even" weight distribution the FWD "advantage" disappears, do it not...??
|
But even if the minor weight advantage, <5% typically, does go in the favor of FWD for "driving" forces what happens when a significant level of that front traction needs to be, SHOULD BE, allocated to lateral use, directional control....??
I think that would be called not going where you wanted to go....