Maybe it's just me, but I found the article very uninspiring and uninteresting. The first part of the article was a lot of "This car is a hybrid. This is what a hybrid does. This is what a Prius does. This is how it's not a Prius." I thought too much time was spent explaining these differences instead of the specific qualities (and non-qualities) of the Honda Civic Hybrid. The end gist seemed to be "Eh, it's okay," but there was nothing in this article that made me feel like I should consider this car.

As for what they liked and disliked, if I recall, they did like the fuel economy and performance, but they thought the interior was weird. There was a specific complaint about lack of lumbar support in the front seats.