Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zimbop
The problem is that the hybrid systems in these muscle cars are not making them more efficient, they're just getting more powerful for the same fuel consumption. There's no savings. A passenger sedan that gets 24 mpg is no environmental trophy. The economic payback can only happen if the vehicle is more efficient, which they aren't.
And yes, for those who want a performance sedan there should be options on the market for them - there was no shortage of these cars before, there's no shortage of them now, and nobody's proposing to get rid of them - but they shoudn't be calling themselves environmentalists. There's nothing inherently "green" about a hybrid system, it's all in how it gets used. If it gets used to boost power instead of save gas then you can't call it an envionmental gain.
On the other hand, if I need to carry a lot of stuff or people, is there any efficient option for me? No. Not a single one. The toyota hybrids are going for power instead of economy. the Jeep liberty diesel went for the power boost instead of economy, the list goes on. Where's just one efficient utility vehicle? There isn't one, and that really bums me out.
|
I think you are making a mistake by equating only MPG with environmentally friendly. By pairing this car up with a hybrid drive train you are able to greatly reduce the emmisions from this car without sacrificing horse power. And there IS a MPG benefit. I don't think you can find another vehicle with 340HP that gets mid to high 20's in real world fueld economy. They will be 18-22 at best.
There are other ways to quantify environmentally friendly, tail pipe emmissions are a huge environmental concern and this car has greatly reduced those with it's SULEV rating. Can you name another 340hp vehicle that meets these emmission standards?