I think most people & scientists agree that global warming is real, but there are just as many scientists who say that the earth is in a natural occuring cycle.
With so much evidence on both sides, I can't say for sure either way.
But there is so much political baggage with this that the whole thing makes me wonder, and side with the natural cycle.
I admit the links I provided are not the theme of the website, but I did look at some of the scientists listed there- and some have connections to NPR. I wonder what other organizations or bias they might have.
Did you know that some environmental groups were even linking the latest massive disaster in the East with global warming?
I've heard it hinted that the U.S. is partly at fault for this for not signing the treaty.
I can't support an ideology that could cost the U.S. Billions, if not Trillions of dollars for an unproven theory, while at the same time we continue to recieve clouds of pollution from all the way across the pond from places like China, who is almost exempt.
We already spend trillions of dollars each year in keeping our coal-fired and nuclear plants, industry and automobiles reasonably clean.
Who's to know how much more would be imposed on us?
Efficient drivers do it better.
1003 miles a tank personal record. 74MPG calculated. HCH1 CVT
Last edited by Hot_Georgia_2004; 01-23-2005 at 01:09 PM.
|