Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VaBeachPrius
. . .
As a disbeleiver, I went out the other day and set the cruise control to 31 miles per hour and sat back to watch the fun on the consumption screen. I was not able to acheive an average of 90-95 mpg as your speed vs. miles per hour chart shows (I have seen it in your responses to others who post good FE numbers using the P&G technique). I had to try it, becuase life would be a lot easier by just setting the cruise control and watching the world go by rather than concentrating on P&G techniques.
|
Excellent! This is how we find out what works and doesn't work by having independent replication of results and when there is a difference, understand what happened.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VaBeachPrius
. . . I had two 5 minutes segments in the 60ish mpg range. I was on mostly flat roads (<20 feet elevation change), no traffic, light winds, 70F, no AC, windows up, 50/48 psi, full conventional oil, etc. Any thoughts? I believe I have 6 bars of SOC. I have about 2300 miles on the car. Could it be that I needed a higher SOC? . . .
|
The only differences:
1) methodology - upon reaching 30 miles per hour and setting the cruise control, I reset the MFD. The mileage was recorded from the MFD calculated display at the end of each 2.5 mile run. I made sure it did not include the accelleration or decelleration to 30 miles per hour but covered ONLY the steady-state mileage.
I don't use the 'mileage bars' since on my NHW11, I have to turn off the vehicle to reset them. Worse, they don't give exact mileage to the nearest 10th of mile per gallon like the calcualted MPG value at the bottom.
2) oil - I run at 3/4ths of full, using Mobil 1. When I returned from Texas, it was one of the earliest modifications, to reduce an overfilled tank to 3/4ths, and it had a measurable impact.
3) fully warmed up - an oil pan temperature probe confirmed that the transaxle oil in my NHW11 is not fully warmed up until at least 30 minutes at speed. Since all power, including the EV mode, has to flow from and through the transaxle, it is important to make sure this part is also at operating temperature.
To minimize the effect of SOC, I put the car in "neutral" at the end of each run and used mechanical braking to stop for the turn around. This avoided any regeneration effects. Also, I mixed up the different speeds for each run.
Of all of these effect, the methodology, using the MFD calculated display value, is the one that I suspect will have the greatest effect. If you have occasion to repeat the test, do follow this approach:
1) fully warmed up - at least 20-30 minutes of normal driving
2) set cruise control at target speed
3) reset MFD mileage and one of the trip meters
4) at end, quickly note the trip meter miles and MFD mileage
My test runs were over a 2.5 mile, flat section, sheltered from a cross-wind by trees on both sides.
BTW, I recently got one of Graham's OBD mini-scanners. Last night, I was able to work up the fuel consumption as a function of injector timing. Later this evening, I'll find some recorded segments at 30 miles per hour to calculate the mileage at this speed using injector timing. The big advantage is I'll be able to document the EV vs. ICE assisted durations.
Bob Wilson