Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by PriusNut
|
I'm just tracking the ripples:
http://www.greenhybrid.com/discuss/s...ad.php?t=12664
My reply to the kid:
--- my reply ---
After checking with the editor, I understand they will review but may
or may not elect to publish this rebuttal:
Dear Editor,
Chris Demorro's opinion piece, "Prius Outdoes Hummer in Environmental
Damage" suffers from a lack of fact checking. He claims ". . . their
ultimate 'green car' is the source of some of the worst pollution in
North America" copied from a flawed _Daily_ _Mail_ article without at
least fact checking the environmental record of the Inco Sudbury
Canadian plant,
http://wwww.inco-sudbury-airquality.com/.
Frank Javor, Superintendent, Health and Environment, CVRD Inco
Smelting Operations e-mailed their annual emissions data going back to
1974, 23 years before Toyota sold their first Prius. Since then, INCO
has made a 90% reduction in SO(2) and INCO emissions continue to go down.
Chris failed to check the amount of nickel used in hybrid batteries,
about 200 pounds per vehicle or 30 million pounds for 150,000 existing
Prius versus the annual Canadian nickel output, over 380 million
pounds. Nickel production is driven by the vastly larger market for
stainless steel and other high temperature metals.
Failure to fact check is compounded when the flawed CNW Marketing
report is cited while the "Institute for Lifecycle Environmental
Assessment",
http://www.ilea.org/lcas/macleanlave1998.html, from
Carnegie Mellon University, reports 73% of the energy used comes from
operation, not manufacturing. Only CNW Marketing makes this false
claim and compounds the error by using dollars instead of Joules, an
energy unit. Those who have read the CNW Marketing report can confirm
a large number of false claims including assignment of shorter vehicle
lifetimes to hybrids, excessively development costs, false recycling
claims, and a claim that hybrids are "a style.' This last lie suggests
that if someone had a gas-only Camry and a hybrid Camry, they would
drive the gas Camry even with $3/gal gas because the hybrid is "a style."
An opinion piece that states the opposite of the facts and data is
deliberately misleading to the point of propaganda. Hybrids aren't for
everyone but in this case, Chris failed to fact check and at best, his
piece was misleading.
Robert J. Wilson
Sr. Network Engineer
9011 Randall Road
Huntsville, AL 35802
--- my reply ---