Quote:
Originally Posted by mmrmnhrm
Unless you can find something with a much higher sugar content than corn, or produce it using far less intensive processes, ethanol's a sham. Don't buy into the hype.
|
Ethanol is a total hype. First of all the amount of arable land required and secured by deforestation for massive amounts of corn we would need to sustain this source of energy would totally offset the slightly lower Co2 emissions from Ethanol.
The amount of energy required to cultivate the corn would be more than the energy we would get from it, with fertilizers, irrigation, harvesting and transportation of the corn to and from facilities in which it would be converted into ethanol.
This is a combination of GM's last ditch effort to save itself from bankruptcy, also attempting to change its image into a more eco-friendly one amidst the Hummer, Corvette, and Escalade line.
The federal govt is definetely interested in creating technology that other countries may adopt and then rely on the U.S., the bread basket of the world, for energy to utilize those technologies.
The real deal is were running out of oil, we hit peak and we got until 2030 until were completely out. Now really take a moment and realize what this means.
This is why were in Afghanistan and Iraq, this is why we not only let the events of 911 happen as we needed another "pearl harbor" to get us there, and this is why we havent pulled out of there even though %70 of the citizens of this country want us out, even as the cost of this war approaches $600,000,000,000.