Quote:
Originally Posted by Prada
You are certainly free to rationalize the Escape's poor crash test results any way you want.
For technical complaints, you would need to contact the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
|
Here's what the IIHS has to say regarding this "heated" subject.
"The Institute began frontal offset crash testing in 1995. In the Institute's 40
mph offset test, 40 percent of the total width of each vehicle strikes a barrier on the driver side. The barrier's deformable face is made of aluminum honeycomb, which makes the forces in the test similar to those involved in a frontal offset crash between two vehicles of the same weight, each going just less than 40
mph.
Test results can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Like full-width crash test results, the results of offset tests cannot be used to compare vehicle performance across weight classes. This is because the kinetic energy involved in the frontal test depends on the speed and weight of the test vehicle, and the crash is more severe for heavier vehicles.
Given equivalent frontal ratings for heavier and lighter vehicles, the heavier vehicle typically will offer better protection in real-world crashes."
I read that to mean that a heavy vehicle with a
G will offer better protection than a light vehicle with a
G, and it's possible that a heavy vehicle with an
A could fair better than the light
G.
The Escape scores a A which is just below G, 2 steps away from P from poor.