GreenHybrid Interactive Hybrid Car Resource
Home Discuss Articles Compare Share Shop
GreenHybrid.com   Hybrid Car Forums   Tech Information   Mileage & Specs   Photo Gallery   Buying Guide  
GreenHybrid Mileage Database - Click here to track your MPG! Join Hybrid car discussions today - Create a FREE GreenHybrid Account

Go Back   GreenHybrid - Hybrid Cars > Hybrid Topics > General Forum

General Forum Nonspecific discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2008, 03:06 PM
Active Enthusiast
 
Real Name: john
Location: Sacramento
Hybrids: 2007 Prius
Posts: 90
Default Re: Why Did Detroit Need to Be Forced Into Fuel Efficiency?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jginaz View Post
Give me a break! Have you ever been to Europe or heard about GM Opel or the Ford Ka? The reason for the cars made here is the market. America travels on highways and no matter what legislation is passed people will still want to wrap their family in a big hunk of steel.
JG
Sure, been to Europe many times and have rented Opels on more than one occasion, Ford Focus, etc. They are awesome cars even at high speed on the M-routes. In fact my Saab 9-5 is a variant of the Opel Vectra platform and a great road car. But GM/Ford do not build these types of quality small cars here, for the reasons I discussed. It has nothing to do with the fact that we have more highways or like a lot of steel, otherwise Toyota and Honda wouldn't be doing so well here, and taking so much GM/Ford marketshare.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2008, 08:24 PM
Enthusiast
 
Real Name: Jay
Hybrids: Ford Escape Hybrid
Posts: 47
Default Re: Why Did Detroit Need to Be Forced Into Fuel Efficiency?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrb_nw View Post
Sure, been to Europe many times and have rented Opels on more than one occasion, Ford Focus, etc.
What is your take on why there seems to be fewer Toyotas and Hondas in Europe then in the US? It is tariff or nationalism or public opinion, or have I just not been observing them?

JG
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2008, 10:38 PM
Active Enthusiast
 
Real Name: john
Location: Sacramento
Hybrids: 2007 Prius
Posts: 90
Default Re: Why Did Detroit Need to Be Forced Into Fuel Efficiency?

You are correct and I presume it is d) all of the above, with an emphasis on pricing. I believe Toyota/Honda are significantly more expensive in Europe than here, and when compared with the home brands (VW, M-B, Volvo, etc) they offer little advantage. I have noticed that the premium European brands have less expensive models there that we do not see here - frequently with smaller displacement, cloth seating, etc. They only sell the loaded models here.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2008, 01:13 AM
Enthusiast
 
Real Name: Aaron
Hybrids: none yet
Posts: 11
Default Re: Why Did Detroit Need to Be Forced Into Fuel Efficiency?

The poster that stated the Detroit-bred marketing ploy that small cars are for losers hit the nail on the head. I think the reality-corrected statement back at them would be most American made small cars are built as losers.

I have owned one american built small car in the last 10 years that I can think of - a 1995 Dodge Neon Highline. Honestly, this was the first small car designed and built in the US, by a US automaker that made any impact in this segment in history.

Shortly after the press releases went out about this new small car, Honda executives arranged to tour the assembly plants and witness this firsthand. Why, you might ask? Because it was inexpensive, due to the abundance of suitable parts Chrysler already had in place. It was easy to build, as it had been designed that way from the ground up - easy to repair too, unlike most anything from the big three. It had an abundance of interior room, thanks to a first-in-the-market cab forward design. And, it had a ton of standard features - also a first on a small car from within the US. They performed well, as Dodge managed to pull 135hp out of a 2.0 SOHC engine - and they had a winner.

The first generation Dodge/Plymouth Neon knocked the worldwide small car market on it's ear, and changed many model designs in other segments due to it's unique styling. When was the first time you had seen round headlights on a car in the years prior to 1995? And then afterwards? I can name many, many cars that this small car design affected - you could see the repercussions in almost every design after that.

I loved my Neon, and it loved me back - great gas mileage, and it cost me almost nothing in repairs and service in the 6 years I owned it. I even used it as a secondary service vehicle when gas first started climbing in price a few years ago. I hauled hundreds of pounds of tools and materials in that car daily, as my service truck could only manage 12 to 15 mpg.

Many people did look down on that car as a "Peon" and me as a cheapskate for driving it (there's that Detroit-bred ignorance again)- but I've known for years that when people lack something in themselves, they tend to overcompensate. I tend to exhibit the reverse of this, looking sideways at people driving alone in a Ford Excursion to the corner store.

What I've gotten tired of over the years, is the fact that Detroit DOES IN FACT have to be forced into doing almost anything related to fuel efficiency or clean-burning.

So let's force em already! I'm not buying the latest junk from the US, but I did try most of them before making that decision.

I rented both a 2 door and 4 door Chevy Cavalier only a few years ago - BOTH JUNK. These cars were like the Chevette v2.0 and I would've been embarassed to take that to market on any level.

And Ford? oh my - the 2008 Ford Escort is actually the 1999 design under new sheetmetal, with a sync stereo. It was an executive decision to NOT bring us the Euro spec Focus (a great car I have heard), and instead try again to sell us a 9 year old legacy model with a hideous new body. It didn't sell well then, and it won't sell better now. Who was the mental midget that decided to put MORE money into an aged and outdated car?!

The 1st gen Dodge Neon showed what can and will happen when the big three get off their butts, and break new ground. The industry takes notice, and they sell in the millions. Sadly, Chrysler followed this surge in momentum with a slew of car designs that only competed with each other. And I'm glad that Daimler & then Cerberus bailed Chrysler out this time, instead of relying on the US govt like back in the days.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you care about fuel efficiency in CT... danatt General Forum 1 02-03-2007 01:01 PM
Chevrolet Equinox Fuel Cell martinjlm Journalism & The Media 31 09-23-2006 11:31 AM
Edwards tests alternative jet engine fuel bar10dah Anything Goes 0 09-21-2006 01:09 PM
Ford Focus Fuel Cell (Press Release) sdctcher Anything Goes 0 04-28-2005 07:14 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Home | Hybrid Discussion Forums | Hybrid Articles Archive | Mileage Database | Hybrid Photo Galleries | Compare Vehicles
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Advertising
GreenHybrid.com, Copyright 2008
InternetBrands.com Automotive Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52