Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Schwa
Not really a good comparison, try comparing the eCVT Prius I to the CVT HCH I at 45 mpg. Considering that's what Toyota was selling when Honda came out with the HCH it makes sense. Now with improved motor, IMA and CVT it's competition to the Prius II, as it should be.
|
So comparing my MT HCH to a P2 is apples to oranges (according to Ken) and according to you a MT HCH is also not a good comparison to the P1. So I guess the MT HCH is in a class of its own and beyond comparison.
Still some will go out of their way to po po my "mild" hybrid in spite of the fact that their "full" hybrid is not any better in any meaningful way.
Lets look at it another way. Lets say 2 guys purchase cars to be raced on a quarter mile track. Lets say that car one is high tech and has a V-tech turbo intercooler engine with fuel injection and 48 valves plus high pressure direct injection and 4 spark plugs per cylinder. Perhaps car one also has the latest brown-tooth connectivity and OBD XXIV and cost $80,000.00. Car one uses a new traction technology called "full" traction.
Car two has a carburated big block and cost $25,000.00. Both cars are not street legal and are only driven on the same quarter mile track. Car one's average quarter mile time is 10 seconds and the best ever was 9.6 seconds. Car two's average quarter mile time is 9.9 seconds and best ever was 9.3 seconds. Car two uses old limited slip technology that the car one drivers call "mild" traction.
Which car is better (neglecting resale)?
EDIT:
BTW the Prius1 is at 45.
0 even and the Honda Civic1 CVT is actually at 45.
3 which is not really a big deal except that the 45.0 people are the ones telling everybody how much better their car is.
BTW2 the new Civic 2 just jumped up from 47 to 48.5 which is currently the highest mileage of any hybrid except the Insights. You could argue that the sample size is too small for the HCH2 and I would agree. Time will tell on the HCH2.