Originally posted by Jason@Sep 9th 2004 @ 7:58 PM Ah. Looks like that was the problem. I reset the variables when the script looped (recalculating all of the overall mileages) and it appears to have worked. Please double-check me on that.
I just did the Excel calculation for all cars in the database this morning. They all match exactly (except for those with override). Looking good!
Quote:
Andy, thanks for being such a careful observer!
Well I fix nasty software problems for a living. Observing the problem, finding out what's wrong, and then convincing everybody involved that this is indeed what's wrong is what I do everyday
Andy
P.S. Oh, I was really busy at work yesterday. I was going to take a look at your code fragment last night but my home PC blow up. Took me all night to find out it's the video card and swap in an old card.
___I thought we had discussed the lmpg inaccuracy a few months ago with Rick Reese’s and my own tanks but I didn’t find the thread? In any case, my current spreadsheet lmpg now matches up with the database lmpg almost exactly. Wait until I post my next tank at which time my spreadsheet, my lmpg, and the database will finally match because it is going to be a good one
___Accwai, thanks for leaning on Jason for the accuracy fix. I always thought it was a significant digit problem and kept hammering on Jason to fix that to make the lmpg numbers match. Significant Database Updates, By Popular Request * tenth post + down …
Right, I remember that. I think the error was blamed on rounding, however. Unless I don't recall correctly, I assumed that whole-number distances and tenths-digit mileages was creating the abberance.
Ah, well. No reason to dwell on the past. It's fixed.
Looks like things aren't absolutely perfect after all... I see a "highway" percentage in the 90's while every tank's percentage was 0-33. I'll look into it. These are sort of useless variables, anyway
Originally posted by Jason@Sep 10th 2004 @ 11:56 PM Looks like things aren't absolutely perfect after all... I see a "highway" percentage in the 90's while every tank's percentage was 0-33. I'll look into it. These are sort of useless variables, anyway
Not useless, its good for a quick scan of your competetors and what they are facing.
Side note: the main bar graph was running on numbers rounded to the tenth insteaded to the whole number. The drawing software rounded these values down. This has been fixed, resulting in a Prius II average of 50 instead of 49.
Side note #2: I am contemplating changing these values to medians instead of means in order to dissassociate "hypermilers."