Re: Understanding the impact of LRR Tires.
Yes, I agree that a label standard is badly needed, and not only by Michelin. I think California is going to make it mandatory in the next few years, so hopefully we will get a decent metric soon.
There are some words, if not metrics, on the Michelin website in the section on LRR research that hints at what is going on. Also, the Michelin American reps are very responsive if you ask them for data outright (but they are hard to reach). The one I talked to before buying the Primacy snow tires was very aware of rolling resistance. He indicated that the Primacy line would eventually replace the entire Energy line -- the reason being improved chemical composition for flexing. As I understood him, the Primacy was basically the next generation of the Energy series.
Incidently, although I have no empirical data because of other seasonal variables like termperature, lower winter driving speeds and different road surface conditions, I have come to the conclusion that the RR ratio for the Primacy Alpin PA3 winter tire is actually equivalent to or better than that of the Energy MXV4 OEM road tires. I think this is the case because my winter FE has not dropped as much as I anticipated (only about 1.8 MPG, average so far this winter) and becasue I know the winter tire is more flexible due to the winterization oil additives. If it were not for the softer compound, and the effect it has on tread wear, I would probably run the winter tire all year long.
It is the ignorant among us that will eventually destroy us all.
|