Like I said, the triple digits section was with a lot of downhill.
I got about 26-30 MPG going uphill.
25% uphill, 25% downhill, 50% flat, total = 46.56 MPG.
I got a ScanGauge because like stated below, the Nav package only reads "max" above 60 MPG.
The SG also displays individual trip data, so you don't have to reset your built-in one.
In my opinion, everyone should hit the RESET button on their fuel economy displays at every gas fill up. A little known secret for most owners, ( but discussed elsewhere on this group ) is the built-in features of the car only hold about 2000 data points. In general, this means less than 3 tanks worth of gas.
If you never hit the reset button ever, you are looking at only your past 2-3 tanks, not totals. Sorry... and yes, this bugs most people, but there's nothing you can do about it! ( except buy something else, like a SG )
As far as battery use, USE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE!
Actually, on the 50 miles of downhill, I had so much regen, I could have charged a dozen battery packs. After my battery was full ( via Nav screen ) I had to shift to N and "waste" energy as heat with friction brakes.
It's hard for me to exceed 42 MPG continuous over the highway, at highway speeds, with no stops for EV driving. Driving in continuous highway conditions in the Mountains net me over 50 MPG for total round-trips time and time again.
While you cannot break laws of physics, Hills / mountains will always give you a net gain in MPG vs. flat driving. Most of our past thinking ( pre-hybrid ) would tell us to take the flattest route. This is FALSE in the hybrid age.
A flat route for 100 miles will net you say 35 MPG both ways.
An uphill route for 50 miles can net you 26 MPG uphill, and 126 MPG dowhill.
Which route uses the least amount of gas???

-John
*both routes assume you can drive 35-40
MPH.... above 40MPH, I do not think you can get 126 MPG... but who knows?