I haven't had any problems with my '93 GMC which I didn't change the brake fluid for something like eight years before I got on the every two year replacement schedule as in my GMC service manual. However, I had a '90 Jetta I bought used that had a sticky front caliper. When I went into an AutoZone to buy a new caliper, I described the problem I was having and the guy behind the counter said it could be a combination of factors. One being that the brake fluid was never changed. The rubber hoses deteriorate over time and tiny bits of the rubber break off and travel up and down the tubes. It's possible that all the crap in the brake fluid lines started clogging up towards the pistons end of the brake lines in the calipers so when I pressed on the brakes, they'd chomp down on the rotors. But when I let off the brake pedal, the pistons took awhile to release the rotors because the crud in the lines kept the pressure built up in the calipers. The guy behind the counter said there were other reasons why to change the brake fluid, one being what was already mentioned: moisture.
The rear bank of plugs may not be as worn out as the front bank, but I'd change them out at 105K miles also. I wouldn't want to push them out to 210K, the next interval. I still haven't decided if I'm going to do them myself or just let the mechanic do it while he's in there doing the timing belt.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by www.ahm-ownerlink.com
Normal
The "normal" schedule is fine for most drivers, even if they occasionally drive in severe conditions.
Severe
Follow the "severe" schedule only if you drive in one or more of these conditions most of the time:
Trips of less than 5 miles (less than 10 in freezing weather)
Extremely hot weather (over 90 degrees F)
Extensive idling or stop-and-go driving
Trailer towing, car-top carrier, or mountain driving
Muddy, dusty, or de-iced roads
|
Even though I live in AZ, I don't believe I fall into the severe category, fully. Most of my trips are over five miles. Sure, it's over 90 degrees F in the summer, but not year round. With autostop, I don't do extensive idling even in stop-and-go driving. No trailers, car-tops, and hardly ever mountain driving. No mud, moderate dust, and rarely de-iced roads. So I wouldn't follow the severe schedule, but I do somewhat go between the normal and severe schedule. Such as, instead of changing oil out at a normal 7,500 or severe 3,750, I do it at every 5K.
Transmission fluid:
For normal conditions, the service manual says to replace the ATF at 120,000 miles or 6 years, then every 90,000 miles or 5 years. For severe, it says replace at 60,000 miles or 3 years, then every 30,000 miles or 2 years. I may go 90K then every 60K.
Coolant:
For the engine coolant, the service manual says to replace engine coolant at 120,000 miles or 10 years, then every 60,000 miles or 5 years, regardless of normal or severe schedule. I'll probably do my first flush and fill around the 105K spark plug and timing belt change, especially if I have to replace my water pump. Mostly, because the vehicle will already be in the shop for the timing belt replacement. Might as well do the coolant at that time, too. Then, I'll do it every 60K.
Of course, this is just what I'm thinking I'll be doing. You guys should do what you're comfortable with. Just keep in mind, doing your service intervals too soon (than what the service manuals describe) doesn't give you a vastly greater benefit in longevity. I think the benefit of doing the next maintenance interval sooner is on an exponential scale. Meaning, the benefits of doing the next interval sooner is small at first, but the closer you get to the actual interval, the greater the increase in protection.
If the x-axis represents time and the y-axis represents benefit, and if -4 on the x-axis represents the new fluid, and +4 is the replacement interval, we only get a benefit value of 1 right in the middle, if we do the change interval in half the recommended time. However, the closer we move to the acutal change interval, the greater the benefit. So instead of cutting your interval times in half, maybe it would be more cost effective and better break even point to do it would be around the 75% life mark instead? Afterall, isn't one of the reasons why we buy hybrids is to reduce our consumption of petroleum based products? Fuel, oil, lubricants, etc...
Of course, there are my views. Your mileage may vary...