Quote:
|
Originally Posted by helterskelter683
Tim I love your idea but even if there are 10 others posting from Jacksonville, I can guarantee you I'm the only one from 32211 - it's a big big city both geographically and populatively.
Still, I'd love to see the trends of geography: what does the AC do to our AZ folks? How severe is the MPG decrease each rainy season in WA?
Jason, I know in some cases it would almost be silly since it's half a globe from one side of TX to the other, or topographically opposite from the Bay Area to San Diego, but would it be possible to have a breakdown by state? Some data would be better than none, and the smaller or more like-climated a state is, the more accurate that data would be regardless of ZIP. AND you'd only be responsible for creating 50 categories, most of which would provide adequate sample size even right now. What do you think?
|
Yeah - so my thought's are similar in that if I tried to filter on "48124" then I'd be lucky if there's even one other person in the database. So the idea was to drop digits because ZIP codes happen to be geographic -- getting more specific as you add digits from left-to-right.
I suppose it could be done so that you don't even enter the mask -- since there's really only (at most) 4 rows of output anyway, might as well automatically just show you all 4 of them . E.g. let you enter your whole zip code and then returning something like this:
You search on "Prius" and Zipcode "32211" and it returns.
Zipcode mask 32211 contains 1 cars. Avg MPG = 52.7
Zipcode mask 322** contains 3 cars. Avg MPG = ___
Zipcode mask 32*** contains 12 cars. Avg MPG = ___
Zipcode mask 3**** contains 25 cars. Avg MPG = ___
Well... you get the idea. It would just give you a feel for how you compare to the broader average of owners that live in *roughly* your vicinity.
My own motivation is that its' really hard for me to compare my FEH to others when I know that the majority of owners are on one coast or the other and I'm in the middle of the country with radically different whether. My summer tanks consistently average the high-side of the window-sticker fuel economy, but my winter tanks lose about 25% of my fuel economy due to the frigid weather that the west coast or the south never has (well, that combined with my short trips not allowing the engine or batteries to warm sufficiently to get the good economy.) Being able to filter the vehicle average fuel economy in the database to just my region would give me a better view of how I'm doing.
The next challenge is that the database doesn't have dates or seasons -- so we can't yet compare "summer" tanks to "winter" tanks.