Quote:
|
Originally Posted by petersun21
The concern I have is that it will not change how you drive the car. If you want to drive 45 mph, you have to use gas. If you want to drive on highway, you have to use gas.
|
I think that is perfectly reasonable. It still is essentially a gasoline car. Trying to stuff both the capacity to run as a fully-functional gasoline vehicle,
and a fully-functional (read: able to cruise 70mph uphill without spinning over the engine) elecrtic vehicle in the same package is just going to be too much weight and complexity to reasonably fit in a single car after the fact. Using some extra batteries -- enough to cover a significant portion of your average drive, but not as much as a pure EV, is a good supplement. I also suspect that using the extra battery capacity alongside the gasoline engine may be more efficient anyway however in the long run than running the elecrtic full out then switching to normal gasoline/hybrid operation after the plug-in pack is spent.
Using that extra power however, the engine could be made to run at its absolute most efficient RPM and load, with the motor picking up the slack, even at highway speeds. The cheaper, cleaner wall-power could be dispensed in such a way as to offset a large amount of the most inefficient gasoline consumption. Another reason I believe that woudl be better is becaue runing in all electric, with only spurts of gasoline use for peak power, would mean that the engine is not getting thoroughly warmed up -- poor for emissions, mileage, and wear and tear. A final advantage would be possible if the extra batteries could accept regenerative charging (not sure if they can), which would then allow much more robust mountain climbing ability -- the pack coudl be spent on the climb, then recharged on the way back down much moreso than the smaller, stock NiMH pack.