Bjaardker:
LOL saying TDIs have not changed in 15 years is like saying hybrids have not changed in 15 years.
its a rediculus statement. So many advances in both technologies, and time marches on.
I admit to being biased twards the TDI as i own an older one 2002, which dosnt have as good a tdi engine as the 2006 version, which fule system deivery is quite diffrent. (not to mention the transmission etc... do i sound envious)
I looked into WHY VW isnt selling diesels in the usa in 2007. Its because the we are still using high sulfer diesel in the USA!
VW is changing from TDI technology to and even more advanced Comon Rail technology for thier diesles, so what does that mean, cleaner emissions, more economy etc. thing is that it requiers low sulfer diesel. Too bad the US lags behind europe and cant get thier act in gear and provide low sulfer diesel. sad huh.
we will have to wait till 2008. By then, the diesel fuel here is as good as what they use in europe. then VW can sell there more advanced comon rail diesels here. they are slated to be sold here in 2008. I am guessing that would be providing the usa does not slip the date AGAIN on low sulfer diesel.
The date slips put vw in a bad position as thier cars require it, and the us gov. mandated all diesel cars have to meet emission standards and use low sulfer diesel. VW has the car and will be selling it in europe. it beats the standard by a good margin... but...without the right fuel... you get the idea.
That wont stop the likes of gm etc... from selling thier diesel pickups i am sure.
You should write for the political mediia.
next time, all the facts would be nice.
Bias is a hell of a thing isn't it.
foo monkey:
I think they hinted that they did the test as a caravan, one behind the other type of thing. It would be interesting to get the details on how they did it. but ya have to figure a 349 mile trek is mostly highway. 349 miles, you think they could have driven around the block once to make it an even 350.