 |
|

05-25-2006, 04:35 PM
|
|
Pretty Darn Active Enthusiast
|
|
Real Name: Bill
Hybrids: 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid (II)
Posts: 315
|
|
go back to 55 miles per hour?
I heard on a local talk radio show that Hillary Clinton recently proposed, as part of finding our way out of the "energy crisis", that we return to 55 miles per hour speed limits. I have not been able to confirm that.
But, assuming this is on the table, what do you think?
|

05-25-2006, 05:09 PM
|
|
Pretty Darn Active Enthusiast
|
|
Posts: 251
|
|
Re: go back to 55 miles per hour?
Didn't they do this in the 70's? Hasn't it been proven to be ineffective?
http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/69045.htm
May 24, 2006 -- WASHINGTON - In a surprise move yesterday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton called for "most of the country" to return to a speed limit of 55 miles per hour in an effort to slash fuel consumption.
|

05-25-2006, 05:14 PM
|
|
Active Enthusiast
|
|
Real Name: Eric
Location: Central PA
Hybrids: 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid
Posts: 141
|
|
Re: go back to 55 miles per hour?
Let's try a carrot rather than a stick - shall we???
Eric
|

05-25-2006, 06:10 PM
|
 |
Engineering first
|
|
Real Name: Bob
Location: Huntsville, AL
Hybrids: Prius Classic 03
Posts: 4,653
|
|
Re: go back to 55 miles per hour?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by toast64
I heard on a local talk radio show that Hillary Clinton recently proposed, as part of finding our way out of the "energy crisis", that we return to 55 miles per hour speed limits. I have not been able to confirm that.
But, assuming this is on the table, what do you think?
|
Back then I had a 1500 cc, VW MicroBus and loved it. But then 55 miles per hour was pretty close to the maximum speed in the high-plains areas areas, +5,000 ft.
Bob Wilson
|

05-25-2006, 08:10 PM
|
 |
Enchanter, Enthusiast
|
|
Real Name: Paul
Location: Seattle, Washington
Hybrids: 03 HCH CVT (retired)
Posts: 851
|
|
Re: go back to 55 miles per hour?
I'd rather have the $100.
I just don't see that doing anything other than making interstate travel painful. My problem, and I'm guessing the problem of a lot of folks, is traffic - not speed. I never see faster than 50 miles per hour due to congestion alone. Want to improve economy? How about addressing 30 minutes of stop and go traffic...

*** Retired after 65,000 outstanding miles ***
|

05-25-2006, 08:17 PM
|
 |
Active Enthusiast
|
|
Real Name: Dean
Location: Buffalo Grove, Ill
Hybrids: 05 Toyota Prius, Super white
Posts: 147
|
|
Re: go back to 55 miles per hour?
If i drive 55 on the interstate here around Chicago, i'd better have a ramp on the back of my car !!!
|

05-26-2006, 01:14 AM
|
|
Active Enthusiast
|
|
Real Name: Ethan
Location: Southern California
Hybrids: 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid w/ Navigation - Magnetic Pearl
Posts: 50
|
|
Re: go back to 55 miles per hour?
Noway! We have to look forward to the future, and not to the past. 
|

05-26-2006, 03:42 AM
|
 |
Active Enthusiast
|
|
Real Name: Meredith
Location: Southeastern PA
Hybrids: Honda Insight
Posts: 109
|
|
Re: go back to 55 miles per hour?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Clubford00
If i drive 55 on the interstate here around Chicago, i'd better have a ramp on the back of my car !!!
|
OMG! I drove thru Chicago once and was petrified. I felt like i was on the autobahn!!!
Here's my opinon. Yes, it is a pretty dumb suggestion which no one will iisten to. I would not care, I am not in a perpetual rush like most people out there. I'd get better fuel mileage too. What I see though, is a recognition of the problem. When the White House says that we do not need to change our ways and big SUV's and poor mileage cars are just "The American Way." Great, being an energy pig is the American Dream. 
At least she is recongizing the problem- it is the first step. If everyone else in Washington ignores the crisis at hand, things are never gonna get better. Denial sucks.
|

05-26-2006, 04:29 AM
|
 |
Pretty Darn Active Enthusiast
|
|
Location: NYC
Hybrids: Galaxy Gray 2006 HCH2
Posts: 297
|
|
Re: go back to 55 miles per hour?
Actually, I think that the speed limit to be lowered to 55 for any vehicle getting less than 30mpg at that speed. You could never enforce it, but SUV's (with the exception of Porsche & BMW) were not designed for high speeds.
55 is a better speed limit than 65, in terms of fuel consumption, but at 55, people drove 65. At 65, people drive 70. A law that everyone's ignoring is useless. Leave it at 65, but enforce it vigorously. It's not a recommendation, it's a law.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 PM.
|