Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Thanks for the explanation, that does make sense. I'm going to have to look into one of these Graham miniscanners if they aren't obscenely expensive. Or maybe CAN view would work. But what you have me thinking is that we might be able to estimate the round-trip efficiency for a regen--->battery--->propulsion cycle (kinetic to kinetic) through a controlled test. The crude methodology might be to start at a known speed (and kinetic energy) below 41mph and a known battery state of charge, allow the vehicle to coast down to a lower speed (and KE) threshold while noting the new battery SoC, then accelerate under EV and note the speed attained when the battery reaches its starting SoC. It would be desireable (more like crucial) to estimate energy losses to things like rolling resistance and aero drag in order to isolate internal system efficiency. Even better to record battery voltage and current throughout the test series to help give an idea of the magnitude of losses in either direction.
I'm just rattling this off without doing a proper experimental design so no doubt there are holes to be filled. |
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Originally Posted by brick
(Post 102807)
Thanks for the explanation, that does make sense. I'm going to have to look into one of these Graham miniscanners if they aren't obscenely expensive. Or maybe CAN view would work. But what you have me thinking is that we might be able to estimate the round-trip efficiency for a regen--->battery--->propulsion cycle (kinetic to kinetic) through a controlled test. The crude methodology might be to start at a known speed (and kinetic energy) below 41mph and a known battery state of charge, allow the vehicle to coast down to a lower speed (and KE) threshold while noting the new battery SoC, then accelerate under EV and note the speed attained when the battery reaches its starting SoC. It would be desireable (more like crucial) to estimate energy losses to things like rolling resistance and aero drag in order to isolate internal system efficiency. Even better to record battery voltage and current throughout the test series to help give an idea of the magnitude of losses in either direction.
I'm just rattling this off without doing a proper experimental design so no doubt there are holes to be filled. You might want to wander over to the Yahoogroup, "Prius_Technical_Stuff" and take a look at the files and search through some of the message archives. This will 'open your eyes' and help you see some of the really interesting experimental stuff that is going on. In particualar, take a peek at what "Hobbit" has been doing. We'll still share results and summaries here. What we learn is important and can help less technically inclined folks 'get a clue.' But the folks in that group 'play with fire' and sometimes 'the smoke escapes.' We're a friendly group of geeks. Bob Wilson |
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Sounds like a good place to hang out and talk shop, so to speak. I'll stop over to see what you guys are up to!
|
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Originally Posted by bwilson4web
(Post 102814)
But the folks in that group 'play with fire' and sometimes 'the smoke escapes.'
Done it a few times, and they never seem to work the same again. |
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Originally Posted by ag4ever
(Post 103004)
Never good when you let the smoke out of electronics.
Done it a few times, and they never seem to work the same again. Bob Wilson |
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Originally Posted by brick
(Post 102807)
I'm going to have to look into one of these Graham miniscanners if they aren't obscenely expensive.
|
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Originally Posted by UTpiper
(Post 102325)
a good deal of this is over my head.
Originally Posted by UTpiper
(Post 102325)
The best case scenario I can achieve at that point (assuming I can’t simply glide to slower speeds) is to maintain a yellow arrow to the battery as often and as long as possible.
Originally Posted by UTpiper
(Post 102325)
It also seems to indicate when the ICE is engaged my best FE will occur when I remain below 40 mph or above 45 mph consistently.
Originally Posted by UTpiper
(Post 102325)
Hovering between 39 and 45 mph means I will run the risk of turning the ICE on and off frequently, thereby reducing my overall FE.
One last note on temperature. When it's 70F or above here I find pulsing and gliding on local streets gets me fantastic mileage. When it's 40F here (lately) I actually do better on the highway because the gas engine won't stop running to keep the car warm. At least on the highway there are no stop lights and I can drive a mostly consistent speed. So to simplify, if it's warm out, driving under 42mph will probably get you your best results. If it's cold out, 65mph is your ticket. |
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Originally Posted by SoopahMan
(Post 103830)
No - yellow arrow bad. Green arrow good. If you see a red arrow, you don't want a yellow one coming from the battery. Below about 15mph though, it is better to have just a yellow arrow from the battery and no red arrow (accellerating on electric-only because it's more efficient at very low speeds).
The idea being the the excess energy produced by the ICE is partially going back to re-charge the battery (as opposed to simply being wasted as excess consumption). In practical terms, when my ICE is running (sending an orange arrow to the wheels) I will either have a yellow arrow running from the battery to the EM or a yellow arrow to the battery. My original take from the thread is that the yellow to the battery is the preferred option in this scenario.
Originally Posted by SoopahMan
(Post 103830)
When it's 40F here (lately) I actually do better on the highway because the gas engine won't stop running to keep the car warm. At least on the highway there are no stop lights and I can drive a mostly consistent speed. So to simplify, if it's warm out, driving under 42mph will probably get you your best results. If it's cold out, 65mph is your ticket.
UTpiper Likely never to be a hypermiler but desperately trying to keep my average FE above 50 mpg during the winter. |
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Originally Posted by UTpiper
(Post 103852)
OK, now I'm confused. ... The idea being the the excess energy produced by the ICE is partially going back to re-charge the battery (as opposed to simply being wasted as excess consumption). In practical terms, when my ICE is running (sending an orange arrow to the wheels) I will either have a yellow arrow running from the battery to the EM or a yellow arrow to the battery.
Originally Posted by UTpiper
(Post 103852)
I get much improved FE when I am running at highway speeds and P&G from 80-65
|
Re: 42 mph Threshold & Block Heaters
Originally Posted by SoopahMan
(Post 103860)
. . . I'm not sure that Pulsing and Gliding is effective at high speeds, because the gas engine is running constantly. I have the most luck above 60mph by accellerating gradually to my target speed (let's say 75mph) and maintaining it. Others with more knowledge of the Prius' workings can probably better comment on the efficiency of P&G at high speeds though.
My data indicates there are two high-speed glides: A) partial ICE power - effectively no wheel torque, ICE running B) battery-assisted, ICE - no wheel torque but some MG1 current to keep the ICE turning over Although "B" has no fuel burn, it is followed by ICE powered recharging of the battery. The "A", partial ICE power mode, does not have to put a charge on the battery. What I don't have is a total energy model that indicates whether mode "A" or "B" has a lower fuel consumption over a long distance trip. The only key I've found is avoiding running the ICE above 2,500 rpm and especially avoiding 3,500 and above. My data shows a fall-off in specific fuel consumption as the ICE rpm approaches and exceeds 3,500 rpm. This is not a function of 'glide' or 'pulse' but what energy is being requested for the current load. IMHO, the best strategy would be a cruise control that would also back-off the speed setting to keep the ICE below some given rpm: 2,500 rpm - very green but slow The data indicates this would provide a directly measurable cruise improvement. Notice that speed has nothing to do with it, ICE rpm only.3,200 rpm - pretty green but lethargic up hills 3,500 rpm - dull green Bob Wilson |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands