Michelin Tours VS Eco-Plus
#1
Michelin Tours VS Eco-Plus
There is no question the Eco-Plus tires will last longer if you can stand the noise but I gave that up at 70,000 miles when I couldn't stand it anymore. I replaced my '05 FEH Front Eco-Plus 25,000 miles ago because of tire damage with the Tours and saw an increase in MPG. I took the rear Eco-Plus off my '05 FEH and put my used Tours on the front of my '09 FEH with 25,000 miles on the rear rims of my '05 FEH. Now I have a full set of Tours with about 25,000 miles on them all, which are still much quieter than the Eco-Plus at 25,000 miles.
The big news is I expect terrible tank mileage averages in my '05 FEH with E10 and my wife driving all the time with Max A/C. Since I changed the Eco-Plus rear tires with the Tours, I have notice a clear 1 1/2 - 2mpg improvement in her tank average. There is no such thing as her changing her driving habits so I know it was the Tours that changed her tank average.
GaryG
The big news is I expect terrible tank mileage averages in my '05 FEH with E10 and my wife driving all the time with Max A/C. Since I changed the Eco-Plus rear tires with the Tours, I have notice a clear 1 1/2 - 2mpg improvement in her tank average. There is no such thing as her changing her driving habits so I know it was the Tours that changed her tank average.
GaryG
#3
Re: Michelin Tours VS Eco-Plus
I have four of these as my "winter" season tires. They are very good for where snow, ice and winter conditions exist. There is a hit in mileage-around 1-1.5 mpg- compared to the stock Eco Plus tires. When the 2005 hybrid arrived, Ford advertised the stock Eco Plus tires are being either 3 or 5% more efficient than compared to "other" tires.
Last edited by Billyk; 09-29-2010 at 05:06 PM.
#4
Re: Michelin Tours VS Eco-Plus
I can vouch for the fact that my Tours, after almost 15K miles now on them, are still VERY quiet, have not decreased my mileage any measurable amount, and...in fact.....seem to have increased my mileage almost 1.3 MPG over the OEM tires on my '08 FEH.
I was originally worried that my MPG would be 1-3MPG lower...didn't happen. Very happy about that.
The tours were expensive...no doubt about that. But, I"m pleased with the benefits so far. Stay tuned....
GR
I was originally worried that my MPG would be 1-3MPG lower...didn't happen. Very happy about that.
The tours were expensive...no doubt about that. But, I"m pleased with the benefits so far. Stay tuned....
GR
#5
Re: Michelin Tours VS Eco-Plus
I can vouch for the fact that my Tours, after almost 15K miles now on them, are still VERY quiet, have not decreased my mileage any measurable amount, and...in fact.....seem to have increased my mileage almost 1.3 MPG over the OEM tires on my '08 FEH.
I was originally worried that my MPG would be 1-3MPG lower...didn't happen. Very happy about that.
The tours were expensive...no doubt about that. But, I"m pleased with the benefits so far. Stay tuned....
GR
I was originally worried that my MPG would be 1-3MPG lower...didn't happen. Very happy about that.
The tours were expensive...no doubt about that. But, I"m pleased with the benefits so far. Stay tuned....
GR
The stock FEH Rim is 2.2 pounds lighter than my new '09 FEHL Rim which is 20.4 pounds. The standard FEH Rim weighs 18.2 pounds. If you add the new Eco Plus at 31 pounds, the total weigh is 49.2 pounds. If you replace the Eco Plus tires with the new Michelins, the standard FEH Rim and Michelin tire would weigh 47.6 pounds each. This is what my new tires and Rims weigh on the front of my '05 FEH. The FEHL Rim and Michelin Latitude Tour tires weighed 49.8 pounds, which is .6 pounds more than the stock FEH rim and the Eco Plus. The folks that got the '09 FEH non Limited models have the 47.6 pound tire and Rim set-up. If you replace the Eco-Plus tires with the Tours, you get the best MPG LRR set-up possible. As the Tours wear, they get lighter and become even more LRR. This is the best way to increase your gas mileage without changing your driving habits.
GaryG
#6
Re: Michelin Tours VS Eco-Plus
I'm not quite sure what the value is in comparing a current production tire with one that is no longer in production (Eco Plus). I notice Continental is selling a new version now anyways, so perhaps they got the message a while ago that the tire could use improvement.
On a similar note, from looking at the Tire Rack website, there are now 8 different LRR tires in the OEM FEH size (235/70-16), from brands such as Bridgestone, Kumho, General, and Pirelli in addition to Michelin and Continental. Hopefully drivers with those tires will post up their reviews as they install them. It's great to see that there is now a wider market for fuel efficient tires!
I was curious what the options are on 16" lightweight forged wheels that would fit an Escape. Anyone here have that info on that?
On a similar note, from looking at the Tire Rack website, there are now 8 different LRR tires in the OEM FEH size (235/70-16), from brands such as Bridgestone, Kumho, General, and Pirelli in addition to Michelin and Continental. Hopefully drivers with those tires will post up their reviews as they install them. It's great to see that there is now a wider market for fuel efficient tires!
I was curious what the options are on 16" lightweight forged wheels that would fit an Escape. Anyone here have that info on that?
Last edited by D-mac; 09-30-2010 at 04:24 PM. Reason: expanding topic
#7
Re: Michelin Tours VS Eco-Plus
I'm not quite sure what the value is in comparing a current production tire with one that is no longer in production (Eco Plus). I notice Continental is selling a new version now anyways, so perhaps they got the message a while ago that the tire could use improvement.
On a similar note, from looking at the Tire Rack website, there are now 8 different LRR tires in the OEM FEH size (235/70-16), from brands such as Bridgestone, Kumho, General, and Pirelli in addition to Michelin and Continental. Hopefully drivers with those tires will post up their reviews as they install them. It's great to see that there is now a wider market for fuel efficient tires!
I was curious what the options are on 16" lightweight forged wheels that would fit an Escape. Anyone here have that info on that?
On a similar note, from looking at the Tire Rack website, there are now 8 different LRR tires in the OEM FEH size (235/70-16), from brands such as Bridgestone, Kumho, General, and Pirelli in addition to Michelin and Continental. Hopefully drivers with those tires will post up their reviews as they install them. It's great to see that there is now a wider market for fuel efficient tires!
I was curious what the options are on 16" lightweight forged wheels that would fit an Escape. Anyone here have that info on that?
When you look at comparing any of you old worn tires to new, your looking at in some cases a lighter new tire being judged by a worn tire that has a reduced weight because most of the rubber is gone.
Most of the rubber on my Eco-Plus was gone and I replaced them with the used Tours with most of the rubber gone. This is a true comparison of LRR tires. If I had replaced the Eco-Plus used tires with new Tours, I bet I would not have seen the big improvement I did with the used Tours. The noise was an open and closed case comparing the two.
Replacing the used Tours with new Tours on the front of my '09 FEH eliminated any tire noise and my '09 now rides like new again. This is why I'm against rotating the FEH all terrain tires. Why put noises front tire on the back and make noises tires from the back by putting them on the front?
Anyway, I'm not against other tire makers but it seems Ford engineers spent a lot of time and money developing the LRR Eco-Plus and the Michelin Latitude Tours LRR tires for the FEH. I've bought all of my Eco-Plus and Tours from my Ford dealer that have been on both of my FEHs. I only paid a total of $30 to my local tire store to make all the changes and balance my tires the other day and now I have a perfect '09 with no tire noise and an '05 FEH with much less noise and better MPG. They both have full size Eco-Plus tires and matching rim spares.
GaryG
#8
Re: Michelin Tours VS Eco-Plus
Looking at the tirerack.com it shows LRR status for the General grabber, and good reviews and spec's / stat's. tirerack does NOT display LRR anywhere I see for the Michelin Tours, though Michelin's little sales pitch mentions it along with their GreenX label for certain tires. The General Grabbber is 10% heavier than the Michelin Lattitude Tour equivalent, and almost the same RPM figure (1 less). The General is $50 each cheaper, and popular enough to be out of stock, but has 5,000 mi lower warranteed life. I HATE noise, and these get as good of reviews for being quiet as any, so I'm strongly considering them,,,, and SOON as I've got 81K on my OEM Conti Eco-Plus screamers.
Any comments/ reviews / experience on these?
Any comments/ reviews / experience on these?
The Tours are top of the line handling, stopping, and ride. The sidewalls are thinner and this makes them lighter and more flexible over bumps. I've read everything about the design of the Tours and they've lived up to the Ford and Michelin claims. The Tours are much better than the cheaper Eco-Plus but the quality, safety, and better MPG is worth paying more to me. What I'm trying to say is, you get what you pay for sometimes. There is nothing easier to get better mileage or worst mileage than simply changing tires. Handling and safety is just as easy.
GaryG
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tim K
Ford Escape Hybrid
4
07-30-2010 02:10 PM