Ethanol - good news and bad
#11
12-28-2008, 10:00 AM
Re: Ethanol - good news and bad
You left out a third value: intelligence. Carter and Clinton were both very intelligent, where Bush has more commonsensical certaintudish piousnessity. 
-- Alan
-- Alan
No, Bush is still worse. Here's why:
-- Carter: An honest man, but a lousy president (high inflation, high unemployment, high gas prices, high deficit).
-- Clinton: A dishonest man, but a a competent president (low inflation, low unemployment, low gas prices, a decreased rate of deficit spending)
With Bush, you get dishonest ("Weapons of Mass Destruction", "Saddam has nukes", free rides for Halliburton, "mission accomplished", Patriot Act). But, as an added bonus, you also get lousy president (high inflation, high unemployment, high gas prices, and super-high deficit).
So, yeah, Bush will be remeembered by history as the worst post-WWII president hands down.
-- Carter: An honest man, but a lousy president (high inflation, high unemployment, high gas prices, high deficit).
-- Clinton: A dishonest man, but a a competent president (low inflation, low unemployment, low gas prices, a decreased rate of deficit spending)
With Bush, you get dishonest ("Weapons of Mass Destruction", "Saddam has nukes", free rides for Halliburton, "mission accomplished", Patriot Act). But, as an added bonus, you also get lousy president (high inflation, high unemployment, high gas prices, and super-high deficit).
So, yeah, Bush will be remeembered by history as the worst post-WWII president hands down.
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jlarki1
Honda Civic Hybrid
1
04-13-2012 04:48 AM
