Accuracy of mpg readings
#11
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
I assume there is high accuracy, well within 1% on the gas pump, and the odometer. Actually, I think the fuel injection pressure and timing (which determines volume) is very accurate, but due to the very large number of very small measurements that vary quite a bit over engine RPM and throttle demand, I would expect cumulative rounding errors to be a problem. That is, I am impressed that it is done so well from such difficult (sensitive) inputs.
-- Alan
-- Alan
#12
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
I believe the display has a sampling error, which manifests itself more in stop-and-go traffic. When I do one long highway run, in my Prius, to the beach and back, my display matches the calculated MPG to within .2 MPG. When I drive a mixture of suburban and highway traffic, with lots of speed changes, the display is always 2-3 MPG higher than the calculated MPG.
#13
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
Originally Posted by hongcho
Just a thought...
How sure are you that the meters on your local gas pumps are as accurate?
Hong.
How sure are you that the meters on your local gas pumps are as accurate?
Hong.
#14
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
I remember reading a story about one gas station that had installed a modified control chip. It would always pump 5 gallons accurately but after that start cheating the customer. People would complain but whenever the pump was tested it always showed accurate because they used a 5 gal test. Finally after testing a number of times because they were getting so many complaints, they used a non standard test amount, found the descrepancy and from there nabbed them on the modified control chip.
#15
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
Originally Posted by realjuice
I too had the same experience with the digital mpg display and manual calculations of mpg. The display read 36.8mpg, but when I filled up with gas the pump shut off at 14.5gallons. With 570 miles on the odometer that comes to 39.3mpg. So I am at a loss too as to why the digital readouts are less than actual miles. I am sure there are a few variables that one has to consider, but almost 3mpg difference is a lot.
Was this your first fillup? Did you remember to subtract the miles the car had when you drove it off the lot from the total odometer reading. I ask because the first time I computed my mileage I forgot to do so. I too thought my actual mileage was better than the computer. Only after I realized my mistake did i come up with an accurate reading. Once corrected, my first tank average as computed by me was 38.4. The car said 39. It wasn't too far off.
#17
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
Just did my second fill-up, but my first where I filled up at the beginning and end of the tank (dealer filled up first tank). The TCH indicated 36.8 mpg and I manually calculated 38.4 mpg. We'll have to see after several more tanks.
BTW, I went from June 19 until July 12 between fill-ups. I went away on vacation for a week, but it's still not too shabby.
BTW, I went from June 19 until July 12 between fill-ups. I went away on vacation for a week, but it's still not too shabby.
#18
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
After three tanks, I can say my mpg readings are roughly 1 mpg on the high side.
1st tank read 43.0 and calculated 41.7
2nd tank read 44.1 and calculated 43.3
3rd tank read 43.5 and calculated 42.2
1st tank read 43.0 and calculated 41.7
2nd tank read 44.1 and calculated 43.3
3rd tank read 43.5 and calculated 42.2
#19
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
I've also found the FE readings to be quite accurate, less than 1mpg on the high side over two tanks. In metric, so converted:
Both tanks finished with a reading of 38.5 mpg (6.1L/100km), manual calc was 38.0mpg and 38.2mpg.
Both tanks finished with a reading of 38.5 mpg (6.1L/100km), manual calc was 38.0mpg and 38.2mpg.
#20
Re: Accuracy of mpg readings
As long as each trip is over 35 MPG, I'm happy. How whacked is this: I get all warm and fuzzy when my car says "EXCELLENT!"
...and you all know what I'm talking about, don't you?
...and you all know what I'm talking about, don't you?