CVT Low Gear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 06-21-2005, 07:08 PM
stevewa's Avatar
Early Adopter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 307
Default Re: CVT Low Gear

There's a couple of things to consider here:

1. The system NEVER allows the battery to become FULLY (i.e. 100 percent of rated capacity) charged. This is because running the battery to extremes of charge and discharge will shorten its lifespan considerably. So instead it will charge to maybe 80 percent, and not allow it to discharge any lower than 20 percent.

2. I believe based on the behavior I've observed that the system will, however, allow regen braking to take the battery charge state all the way to whatever charge limit the system has. Once you reach that level a couple of different things seem to happen...first the ICE is spun up (to consume any excess charge?) and the foundation brakes are increased at _nearly_ the same time. The result can be a slight "surging" sensation as the vehicle feels as though it's going to accelerate on you when it starts the ICE, then the brakes apply to compensate.

At any given moment, the hybrid system may be in any one of a number of states. One or both motor generators may be providing power or generating electricity, the ICE may be running or not. Sometimes power from the motor generator will go to the battery and sometimes it will go to the traction motor. In short, this is a very complex system and if they gave you true manual control over it you could never hope to manage it as well as the PCM does...just too many variables to consider.
 
  #12  
Old 06-22-2005, 05:34 AM
nitramjr's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston (north suburbs)
Posts: 743
Default Re: CVT Low Gear

Originally Posted by dknapp
OT is maybe Over Temp
Just reread my post from before - "ot" was supposed to be "or". Guess I should proofread what I post or start getting some sleep at night.....sorry 'bout that.
 
  #13  
Old 08-08-2006, 06:29 PM
WScottCross's Avatar
Megageek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 185
Default Re: CVT Low Gear

Originally Posted by nitramjr
I am convinced that my gas mileage has increased by using "low" in city type driving. By letting the regen braking slow me down, I avoid using the friction brakes much. As long as the accelerator peddle is depressed at all, the vehicle behaves the same in "L" or "D".

I would love to see some sort of breakdown on how much braking is done with the regen and how much is with the friction brakes. What I do know is that once the friction brakes kick in, energy is being wasted by generating heat instead of electricity.
One clue is the occasional complaint about how the brakes handle in wet conditions. They seem to slip somewhat when transitioning from regen braking to friction brakes and that has only happened to me at very low speeds (<5MPH) I think the system will use mainly regen braking unless you hit the pedal hard or the battery is mostly full. That's a guess on my part, and maybe I'm overlooking something, but that's what it seems like to me.
 
  #14  
Old 08-08-2006, 06:42 PM
nitramjr's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston (north suburbs)
Posts: 743
Default Re: CVT Low Gear

Wow - talk about a blast from the past. I forgot all about this thread.

Driving the FEH for the last almost year and a half I realize how so much has changed but how so much has stayed the same. I still prefer L over D in all but wide open highway driving and my mileage is still improving. Gary (in his now world famous LGA thread) has shown how he does better using fake shifts and N.

14 months ago when this thread started we were all just guessing at what we were doing. Now that we know what is going on and how these work, we are trying to master these things.

14 months from now what will we be doing? Will we be looking back at 37 mpg and saying "I can't believe I thought 37 was good" like I am doing looking back at my first 30 mpg tank......? I thought I was "it" when I hit 400 miles to go.....

Amazing......
 
  #15  
Old 08-08-2006, 07:08 PM
Pravus Prime's Avatar
Prof. of Hybridology
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,070
Default Re: CVT Low Gear

Originally Posted by nitramjr
Wow - talk about a blast from the past. I forgot all about this thread.

Driving the FEH for the last almost year and a half I realize how so much has changed but how so much has stayed the same. I still prefer L over D in all but wide open highway driving and my mileage is still improving. Gary (in his now world famous LGA thread) has shown how he does better using fake shifts and N.

14 months ago when this thread started we were all just guessing at what we were doing. Now that we know what is going on and how these work, we are trying to master these things.

14 months from now what will we be doing? Will we be looking back at 37 mpg and saying "I can't believe I thought 37 was good" like I am doing looking back at my first 30 mpg tank......? I thought I was "it" when I hit 400 miles to go.....

Amazing......

LOL, No kidding.

What brings this thread up from the dead?
 
  #16  
Old 08-09-2006, 12:49 PM
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 2,468
Default Re: CVT Low Gear

Thanks WScottCross

You've brought up an old thread that identifies Nitranjr (Ray Martin) as the first person that took advantage of low gear in the FEH. It looks like that led Pravas Prime (Rich) to start using "L" also.

Look at the date (6/22/05) before WScottCross brought the thread alive again. It appears, like Ray pointed out, how much things have stayed the same, and how modifications were built on that first discovery.

The people in that thead are the true pioneers of the FEH. I agree with Ray also on his comment about getting 30mpg then and getting 37mpg now. Look at how Hawflake was bringing up patents and how Stevewa was talking about the state of charge the computer would limit charging and discharging for battery life. These people were the cutting edge then, and still remain on the cutting edge now.

Wayne Gerdes has proven records are made to be broken the other day again by getting 180mpg at the Hybridfest Event in a friends (Billy's) Honda Insight. Wayne and these pioneers have helped me push my FWD FEH to over 70mpg.

Who would ever believe that a 50mpg tank would be possible in a stock 2005 Ford SUV? I do! Thanks for all your help guys

GaryG
 
  #17  
Old 08-09-2006, 01:08 PM
WScottCross's Avatar
Megageek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 185
Default Re: CVT Low Gear

I found this thread while searching for something and didn't even realize that it was from over a year ago.
 

Last edited by WScottCross; 08-09-2006 at 01:18 PM. Reason: typo
Related Topics
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Geckoboy
Toyota Camry Hybrid
7
07-13-2013 08:52 AM
julianwilso
Ford Escape Hybrid
2
01-17-2009 03:46 PM
Escape_from_Hanover
Ford Escape Hybrid
17
12-16-2008 07:54 AM
Sky Blue
Toyota Camry Hybrid
27
08-15-2008 12:36 AM
GaryG
Ford Escape Hybrid
245
04-20-2007 02:46 PM



Quick Reply: CVT Low Gear


Contact Us -

  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:23 AM.