Newest modified technique good for 84mpg so far.
#11
08-18-2005, 04:51 AM
Re: Newest modified technique good for 84mpg so far.
Truly.
No doubt, an embarrassing tank.
You guys remember the song "anticipation" ? I'm afraid LakeDude has been scorned by his MPG display. I feel for you, guy. Perhaps flowers and some air in her tyres would get the relationship back on track ?
No doubt, an embarrassing tank.
You guys remember the song "anticipation" ? I'm afraid LakeDude has been scorned by his MPG display. I feel for you, guy. Perhaps flowers and some air in her tyres would get the relationship back on track ?
Originally Posted by xcel
___Man, just 70.2 mpg? That really sucks! What the heck were you doing?
#12
08-18-2005, 02:03 PM
Re: Newest modified technique good for 84mpg so far.
OK 70.2 is still above average but I was hoping for a top 3 tank. Stupid display. Actually it is the differences in filling that make the largest portion of the discrepancy. The display is at 63.5 lifetime while the calculated figure is 61.5 for a difference of 3.3%.
Note to RJ. I'd consider the playfield level if you subtracted 3.3% from all the tanks you lack actual fill data for.
Note to RJ. I'd consider the playfield level if you subtracted 3.3% from all the tanks you lack actual fill data for.
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alsadi
Honda Civic Hybrid
0
10-23-2012 06:00 AM
ModelinaHybrid
Toyota Camry Hybrid
52
06-22-2007 05:17 PM
