Residual value vs. non-hybrid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 05-19-2011, 05:50 PM
Red's Avatar
Red
Red is offline
Pretty Darn Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 322
Default Re: Residual value vs. non-hybrid

Compare to a V6, not the I4. Performance is considerably beter than the I4.
 
  #12  
Old 05-19-2011, 07:03 PM
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 2,468
Default Re: Residual value vs. non-hybrid

Originally Posted by Red
Compare to a V6, not the I4. Performance is considerably beter than the I4.
In Dave's case, he chose the '09 FEH, which the performance is better than an older V6 Escape. Ford stated that the '05 FEH was comparable to the V6 performance, but E10 changed that giving the V6 a clear advantage over power, but not MPG.

Yesterday's V6 is no where near today's V6 compared to performance and the same goes for the I4. They both share increased performance and MPG in the newer engines.

I don't tap into the performance in my '09 FEH unless it will increase my MPG over stopping and getting started again. Everything is there as far as performance when I need it and I can't say I'll ever need any more.

The newer direct injection and direct injection EcoBoost engines can give you the best of both Worlds. Ford has better performance and better MPG with smaller engines now.

GaryG
 
  #13  
Old 05-19-2011, 08:00 PM
2k3 Mach's Avatar
Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Avon, OH
Posts: 45
Default Re: Residual value vs. non-hybrid

Originally Posted by Red
Compare to a V6, not the I4. Performance is considerably beter than the I4.
I bought this Hybrid for one reason, fuel economy. Unless you're towing, there is no reason to get the V6, IMO. (Talking about 2009's and later)

My father's 2009 2.5 6-speed auto is pleanty fast, and I averaged 32.5 MPG driving from Jersey to Cleveland 2 summer's ago.

In the 2,500 miles I've put on my FEH,I don't think I've tach'ed up over 3 grand yet.
 
  #14  
Old 05-22-2011, 02:04 PM
jswjr600's Avatar
Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 36
Default Re: Residual value vs. non-hybrid

Originally Posted by 2k3 Mach
I bought this Hybrid for one reason, fuel economy. Unless you're towing, there is no reason to get the V6, IMO. (Talking about 2009's and later)

My father's 2009 2.5 6-speed auto is pleanty fast, and I averaged 32.5 MPG driving from Jersey to Cleveland 2 summer's ago.

In the 2,500 miles I've put on my FEH,I don't think I've tach'ed up over 3 grand yet.

With the new Ecoboost F-150 getting 28 HWY MPG, i would expect to see vehicles like the Edge start to get in the low 30 MPG range with Ecoboost engines.

I just picked up a used 08 FEH, and intend to keep it until I can find a 2 year old used 2012 FEH...those should be getting a combined 38-40 MPG rating.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kcrossley
Honda Accord Hybrid
1
07-17-2006 10:17 PM
Clashed
Toyota Highlander Hybrid
2
02-22-2006 01:35 PM
caymandiver75
Honda Accord Hybrid
4
01-14-2006 01:18 PM
hawkGT647
Journalism & The Media
3
07-26-2005 04:24 AM



Quick Reply: Residual value vs. non-hybrid


Contact Us -

  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:30 AM.